This week, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of allowing Idaho to enforce a ban on gender-affirming medical care for minors and deepened divisions among lower courts debating the issue.
While the underlying case concerns the constitutionality of a ban on gender-affirming medical care for minors, the court’s order did not address the merits of the issue — only whether the law ...
The gender-affirming treatment helped the now-16-year-old find happiness again, her father said. A decision by the U.S. Supreme Court late Monday allowing Idaho to enforce its ban on such care for ...
Horras is among the Idaho parents desperate to find ... before the U.S. Supreme Court again. Last year, a ban on gender-affirming care for minors in Arkansas was shot down by a federal judge ...
Montana’s ban also is temporarily on hold. The states that have enacted laws restricting or banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors are Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, Florida, ...
Horras is among the Idaho parents desperate to find ... before the U.S. Supreme Court again. Last year, a ban on gender-affirming care for minors in Arkansas was shot down by a federal judge ...
Most of the bans on gender-affirming care for minors that have been enacted across the U.S. have been challenged with lawsuits. A federal judge struck down Arkansas’ ban as unconstitutional. Judges’ ...
Gender-affirming care for minors is already banned in the state, but Gov. Bill Lee took things a step further.